Ex Parte Sutherland et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                          
                                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                            Ex parte ANN M. SUTHERLAND and                                                      
                                                 DAVID F. SUTHERLAND                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                                    Appeal No. 2006-1077                                                        
                                                 Application No. 10/034,907                                                     
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                            
                  Before WARREN, KRATZ and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                  GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                          This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection mailed October                       
                  20, 2004.  Claims 11-16, 18 and 19 are pending and have been finally rejected.                                
                          Claims 11-16, 18 and 19 are reproduced below:                                                         
                                 11.  A light transmitting window covering panel formed of a fabric                             
                          comprising staple fiber acrylic yarn woven in groups of warp threads and groups                       
                          of weft threads, the fiber content of said yarn being about 100 percent pigmented                     
                          acrylonitrile polymer, and the weave density being such as to provide openings                        
                          between said groups of  warp threads and said groups of weft threads of about                         
                          0.03 inches to 0.25 inches to provide human visual perception through said panel                      
                          and blocking the transmission of ultraviolet light through said panel in A category                   
                          wavelength in a range of about 69 percent to 76 percent and in B category                             
                          wavelength in a range of about 74 percent to 78 percent.                                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007