Appeal No. 2006-1077
Application No.10/034,907
Grounds of Rejection
1. Claims 14, 16, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph.
2. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Edwards in
view of Wade and further in view of Hughes
3. Claims 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
Edwards in view of Wade and Hughes as applied to claim 11 and further in view of
Lynch.
4. Claims 14 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
Edwards in view of Wade and Hughes as applied to claim 11 and further in view of
Goldman.
5. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Edwards in
view of Wade, Hughes and Goldman and further in view of Goodfellow.
6. Claims 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
Edwards in view of Wade, Hughes and Goldman and further in view of Lynch.
We reverse as to all five grounds of rejection.
Background
The invention relates to a light transmitting window covering panel formed of a
fabric which is capable of both providing human visual perception therethrough and
blocking the transmission of ultraviolet light.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007