Ex Parte Wacyk - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is                    
               not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                  

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                           __________                                                               
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                    Ex parte IHOR WACYK                                                             
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-1156                                                          
               Application No. 09/903,882                                                                                           
                                                          ___________                                                               
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                          ___________                                                               
               Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  
                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4 and 9-17.  Claims 5-8                    
               have been indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter and are not                        
               before us on appeal.                                                                                                 
                       The invention pertains to wireless control of one or more nearby devices, best illustrated                   
               by reference to representative independent claim 1, reproduced as follows:                                           
                       1.      A system comprising a wireless controller that binds one or more devices from a                      
               neighborhood group of devices to the controller, the controller having a processor that processes                    
               data and formats signals and a transceiver that transmits and receives signals, the controller in a                  
               binding procedure transmitting an address inquiry signal to an address (ADDR1) of a first device                     
               in the neighborhood, receiving back a response to the address inquiry signal from the first                          
               device, determining whether one or more additional responses to the address inquiry signal are                       
               received from one or more of the other devices in the neighborhood group, and sending a                              
               randomize address signal addressed to ADDR1 if one or more additional responses to the                               
               address inquiry signal is received.                                                                                  
                       The examiner relies on the following references:                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007