Appeal No. 2006-1156
Application No. 09/903,882
transponder. Appellant does not argue this combination except to rely on previous arguments
made with regard to claims 9 and 10. Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claim 11
under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Finally, with regard to claim 17, this rejection is based on a combination of Kowalski,
Armstrong and Guerrieri. Appellant merely relies on the arguments made previously anent
claim 12. Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-4 and 9-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007