Ex Parte Guerra - Page 9


                    Appeal No. 2006-1161                                                                                                
                    Application No. 10/322,254                                                                                          


                           We agree with the Examiner that, once reactants have been separated from                                     
                    product, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to recycle the starting                         
                    materials “for the purpose of more efficient conversion of unreacted components.”  Lewis                            
                    at 995.  Appellants do not argue to the contrary, but rather state “step d) first requires step                     
                    c), which . . . Kimoto cannot anticipate.  As a result, it makes no sense to proceed with                           
                    step d) and there can be no rationale to combine Kimoto with the Dictionary reference.”                             
                    Brief at 9.  Given that step c) is either inherently disclosed in or suggested by Kimoto, a                         
                    skilled artisan would have been motivated to proceed with step d), as the Examiner                                  
                    found.  See Answer at 5.                                                                                            
                           Claim 1 also requires “adding hexfluoropropylene oxide (HFPO) in an amount                                   
                    such that X-Rf-COF remains in molar excess of HFPO by at least 10%.”  Appellants                                    
                    argue that “Kimoto fails to anticipate and teaches away from” this claim limitation.  Brief                         
                    at 8.                                                                                                               
                           The Examiner responds:                                                                                       
                           Kimoto et al. do suggest using the X-Rf-COF in molar excess of HFPO                                          
                           by at least 10% (see column 11, lines 50-52 wherein it is taught that                                        
                           one can use a molar ratio of HFPO to FSO2(CF2)nCOF from about 1/20                                           
                           to about 100/1).  Thus, at the ratios ranging from 10:1 up to 20:1                                           
                           [FSO2(CF2)nCOF:HFPO], Kimoto teaches using the FSO2(CF2)nCOF in                                              
                           a molar excess of at least 10% relative to the HFPO.  Kimoto further                                         
                           goes on to teach that when the compound having the structure disclosed                                       
                           in column 11, lines 53-58 has a low p value, for example when p is 0 or                                      
                           1, the relative proportion of FSO2(CF2)nCOF is increased.  Thus,                                             
                           implying that if one wants to obtain the monoaddition product, i.e., p                                       
                           equal to zero, then one should use higher amounts of the                                                     
                           FSO2(CF2)nCOF reactant relative to the HFPO reactant.  [Answer at 5.]                                        
                           Appellant does not dispute that the claimed “at least 10% molar excess” language                             
                    falls within Kimoto’s disclosed range of reactants, i.e., the “applicable molar ratio of                            


                                                                   9                                                                    



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007