Ex Parte Paton et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2006-1231                                                       
         Application No. 10/180,686                                                 

              12: A device comprising:                                              
                   a substrate;                                                     
                   a semiconductor device on said substrate, said                   
              semiconductor device comprising an active region                      
              comprising silicon;                                                   
                   a silicide contact on said active region, said                   
              silicide contact comprising a first metal silicide and                
              an additional material, wherein said first metal                      
              silicide comprises a metal capable of forming a second                
              metal silicide, wherein an amount of said additional                  
              material causes formation of said first metal silicide                
              to be energetically favored over formation of said                    
              second metal silicide.                                                
                                   THE REFERENCES                                   
         Anjum et al. (Anjum)              5,470,794        Nov. 28, 1995           
         Cabral, Jr. et al. (Cabral)     2002/0115262       Aug. 22, 2002           
         (filed Feb. 21, 2001)                                                      
         Maa et al. (Maa)                  6,468,901        Oct. 22, 2002           
         (filed May   2, 2001)                                                      
         T. Ohguro et al. (Ohguro), “Nitrogen-doped nickel monosilicide             
         technique for deep submicron CMOS salicide”, paper presented at            
         Int’l Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., Dec. 10-13,              
         1995, at 453-56.                                                           
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                   
              The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 12, 14, 15, 18,          
         29, 31, 32 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by               
         Ohguro; claims 12, 15, 29 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as               
         anticipated by Anjum; claims 12-15, 17, 18 and 29-34 under                 


                                         2                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007