Ex Parte Mathew et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2006-1350                                                                                      
              Application No. 10/074,732                                                                                

                     We therefore sustain the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-12, 14, 16-21, 23-25,                   
              and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Adkisson and Fried and the                        
              rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Adkisson, Fried,                   
              and Forbes.                                                                                               


                                                    CONCLUSION                                                          
                     The rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-12, 14-21, 23-25, and 34 under 35 U.S.C.                     
              § 103 is affirmed.                                                                                        























                                                          -7-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007