Appeal No. 2006-1431 Παγε 9
Application No. 10/386,855
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Litwin in view of Heaton is
reversed, along with claims 10-14 and 16, which depend from
claim 9.
We turn next to the rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Litwin in view of Heaton and
Iscovich. We reverse the rejection of claim 15 because Iscovich
does not make up for the deficiencies of the basic combination to
Litwin and Heaton.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007