Ex Parte Lemmens et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                   for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board.                             

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                     ____________                                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                     ____________                                                     
                   Ex parte LUC LEMMENS, SJAAK SCHEL, KOEN VERMOLEN,                                  
                SIMON ANNE DE MOLINA, WALTER SPIRITUS and BART VANDEWAL                               
                                     ____________                                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2006-1447                                                 
                              Application No. 10/775,881                                              
                                Technology Center 3600                                                
                                     ____________                                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                                       
                                     ____________                                                     
          Before OWENS, BAHR, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                 
          rejection of claims 1-6.  Claims 7-17 stand allowed.                                        

               We AFFIRM.                                                                             

















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007