Ex Parte Nguyen et al - Page 2



              Appeal No. 2006-1449                                                                                            
              Application No.  10/404,266                                                                                     
              structure and solid electrical contacts.  Also, the technique is inexpensive because it                         
              may be employed using standard soldering                                                                        
              processes.                                                                                                      
                      Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                        
                      1. An apparatus comprising:                                                                             
                             a printed circuit board (PCB) having a top side and a                                            
                      bottom side to attach to first pins of a first device to the                                            
                      top side; and                                                                                           
                             a plurality of raised pads on the bottom side and                                                
                      attached to upper areas of second pins of a second device to                                            
                      provide electrical connections between the first pins and                                               
                      the second pins.                                                                                        
                      The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                         
              Burns et al. (Burns)     6,608,763          Aug. 19, 2003                                                       
              (Filed September 20, 2000)                                                                                      
                      The following rejection is on appeal before us:                                                         
                      Claims 1-3, 9-11, 17-19, and 25-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                           
              being anticipated by Burns.                                                                                     
                      Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make                                 
              reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                      
                                                           OPINION                                                            
                      We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection                                
              advanced by the examiner and the evidence of anticipation relied upon by the examiner                           
              as support for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration,                        
              in reaching our decision, the appellants' arguments set forth in the briefs along with the                      



                                                              2                                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007