Appeal No. 2006-1450 Application No. 09/933,786 motivation to combine the references, and that there is no showing that it would provide a reasonable expectation of success. We note that Prioste was relied upon for its teaching of bit shifting with sign and zero extension. We also find that Prioste provides adequate motivation for combining its teachings with that of Groves. Particularly, at column 1, lines 42-44, Prioste indicates that its suggested approach increases the processing time of the data and reduce the cost of circuitry used for shifting. Therefore, the combination of Groves and Prioste was proper and would thus provide a reasonable expectation of success. It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence relied upon and the level of skill in the particular art would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art the invention as set forth in dependent claims 3-10, 13-20 and 23-33. Accordingly, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 3-10, 13-20 and 23-33 over the combination of Groves and Prioste. 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007