Ex Parte Brown - Page 2


              Appeal Number: 2006-1514                                                                                      
              Application Number: 09/950,526                                                                                



                                                     BACKGROUND                                                             

                  The appellant's invention relates to a method of generating a sales modeling baseline.  An                
              understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                   
              reproduced below.                                                                                             
                     1. A method for generating a modified sales baseline for a product, said method                        
                     comprising:                                                                                            
                     storing an original baseline;                                                                          
                     receiving a plurality of consumer purchasing characteristics, each of said                             
                     consumer purchasing characteristics representing a behavior of consumers with                          
                     respect to said product, said consumer purchasing characteristics including pantry                     
                     loading;                                                                                               
                     receiving promotion information, said promotion information including quantities                       
                     of said product sold during a promotion of said product; and                                           
                     modifying said original baseline in response to said consumer purchasing                               
                     characteristics and said promotion information.                                                        


                                                       PRIOR ART                                                            
                  The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                   
              claims is:                                                                                                    
              Abraham and Lodish, An Implemented System For Improving Promotion Productivity Using                          
              Store Scanner Data, Marketing Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, Summer 1993, pp. 248-269 (Abraham)                     
                                                      REJECTIONS                                                            
                  Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant               
              regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (mailed                      
              February 2, 2006) for the reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellant’s brief (filed              
              November 8, 2004) and reply brief (filed February 27, 2006) for the arguments thereagainst.                   
                  Claims 1 through 8, 10, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                  
              Abraham.                                                                                                      


                                                             2                                                              


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007