Appeal Number: 2006-1514
Application Number: 09/950,526
Claims 9 and 12 through 25 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Abraham.
The appellant has argued all claims together and accordingly we sustain the examiner's
rejection of claims 9 and 12 through 25 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Abraham
for the reasons stated above.
CONCLUSION
To summarize,
• The rejection of claims 1 through 8, 10, and 11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by Abraham is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 9 and 12 through 25 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious
over Abraham is sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
ROBERT E. NAPPI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LINDA E. HORNER ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANTON W. FETTING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007