The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VIHO NISSINEN, ELIAS RETULAINEN,
and JOHAN GRON
____________
Appeal 2006-1543
Application 10/239,769
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: November 30, 2006
____________
Before WARREN, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the rejection of claims 15-21, 30-34, 36, and 37, the
only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the
appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007