Appeal 2006-1543 Application 10/239,769 The Examiner further rejects claims 21, 33, and 34 on the basis that “there is nothing that teaches, suggests, or infers that charged particles are applied to the heated belt, nor electrostatic means relative to the heatable dryer belt per claims 21, 33-34.” (Answer 6). Appellants argue that this allegation is without merit citing the original Specification at page 13, lines 21-30. This argument is not persuasive, however, because the portion of the original Specification cited by Appellants merely discloses applying the treatment agent to the web surface “via a roll or belt by charging the belt, then adhering the powder to this transfer means.” Nowhere does this portion of the original Specification mention using the dryer belt as the transfer means. We cannot agree with Appellants that this portion of the original Specification would convey to the artisan that Appellants were in possession of the concept of using the dryer belt as the transfer means. There is some confusion on the record with regard to the rejection of claims 31 and 32. In the final rejection, the Examiner rejected these claims on the additional basis that “[n]owhere is there a disclosure of applying anti- stick material to a heatable belt of a dryer.” (Answer 4). Appellants found this to be less than clear, but argued that the language was supported (Br. 8). The rejection reproduced in the Answer does not specifically reject claims 31 and 32 on the additional basis articulated in the final rejection. In the Response to Argument section of the Answer, the Examiner responds to Appellants’ argument by stating that “[t]he teachings are for a heated belt being run against a coating on a base web (as admitted by Applicants’ own arguments on top of page 9), not on ‘the surface of the base web.’” (Answer 9-10). Appellants argue in the Reply Brief that the Examiner has made a new ground of rejection which is untimely (Reply Br. 2-3). Appellants, 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007