Appeal 2006-1543 Application 10/239,769 The Examiner finds that there is no support in the original disclosure for the embodiment of newly added Figure 2. Namely, there is no support for applying a treatment agent to heated belt 2 of the belt dryer and subsequently transferring the treatment agent to web 10 as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 is reproduced below: Figure 2 - A diagrammic view of the added embodiment of the invention in which a treatment agent within feed chamber 23 is applied to the dryer belt 2 which transfers the treatment agent to the web 10. Appellants argue that the objection/rejection is incorrect as the matter sought to be added to the Specification is not “new matter” since it was disclosed in the text of the Specification and the Claims originally filed in the U.S. on September 24, 2002 and appears in the PCT application filed 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007