Appeal No. 2006-1546 Application No. 09/974,262 by claims 19 and 20. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (C.C.P.A. 1980). The § 103(a) rejection is affirmed. CONCLUSION In summary, we sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 112, first Paragraph written description rejection and the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection. The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept. 13, 2004). AFFIRMED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 22Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007