Appeal No. 2006-1557 Παγε 14 Application No. 10/220,514 CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 2-16 and 19-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as being obvious over Elger is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) PFK/TFPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007