The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ROLF MEYER,
DIETER FISCHER, and
LUTZ ZOGG
____________
Appeal 2006-1582
Application 10/126,350
_____________
DECIDED: AUGUST 24, 2006
_____________
Before WARREN, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants’ appeal the decision of the primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 to 4,
all the pending claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.1
1 In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellants’ position presented in the Brief filed
August 12, 2005, and the Reply Brief filed December 27, 2005.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007