Appeal No. 2006-1605
Application No. 09/470,741
Ng 5,262,854 Nov. 16, 1993
Kim et al. 6,175,592 Jan. 16, 2001
Bose et al. 6,215,822 Apr. 10, 2001
Rosman et al. 6,222,550 Apr. 24, 2001
Vetro et al., “Frequency Domain Down-Conversion of HDTV Using
Optimal Motion Compensation Scheme,” International Journal of
Imaging System and Technology, vol. 9, no. 4 (August 1998),
pp. 1-16.
Dugad et al., “ A Fast Scheme of Altering Resolution in the
Compressed Domain” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999
IEEE Computer Society Conference, Vol. 1 (June 1999),
pp. 213-218.
Rejections At Issue
A. Claims 1-7, 9, 11-12, 16-19, 21-24, 28-30 and 32-34 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
combination of Vetro et al., Ng and Bose et al.
B. Claims 8 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the combination of Vetro et al., Ng,
Bose et al and Kim et al.
C. Claims 14 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the combination of Vetro et al., Ng, Bose
et al. and Dugad et al.
D. Claims 15 and 27 stand rejected under 35 USC 103 as being
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007