The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAUL R. D’MURA
_______________
Appeal No. 2006-1704
Application No. 10/640,544
_______________
HEARD: JUNE 7, 2006
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-25, which constitute all the
claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a system and methodology
to facilitate material class processing. Specifically, one or
more class structures are defined that generically describe a
grouping of components, such as materials, that can be applied to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007