Appeal No. 2006-1704 Application No. 10/640,544 in the recipe. Since the examiner has failed to properly interpret the claimed invention, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of anticipation. In summary, we have not sustained the examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-25 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/kis 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007