The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte TORSTEN SIXT, ERHARD BOSCH, MARTINA HAERING, and WOLFGANG SCHUETT __________ Appeal No. 2006-1761 Application No. 10/153,074 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 10 and 18 through 20, which are the only claims pending in this application (see the amendment dated April 21, 2005, subsequent to the final rejection, which has been entered by the examiner as per the Advisory Action datedPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007