Ex Parte Sixt et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                                     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte TORSTEN SIXT,                                 
                                   ERHARD BOSCH,                                      
                                  MARTINA HAERING,                                    
                                        and                                           
                                  WOLFGANG SCHUETT                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2006-1761                                  
                             Application No. 10/153,074                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          refusal to allow claims 1 through 10 and 18 through 20, which are           
          the only claims pending in this application (see the amendment              
          dated April 21, 2005, subsequent to the final rejection, which              
          has been entered by the examiner as per the Advisory Action dated           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007