Appeal No. 2006-1761 Application No. 10/153,074 8). Appellants further argue that Koschany does not indicate what type of silicone seal should be used out of possibly thousands of silicones, and there is no motivation to single out the sealant of Kovar from among all the references as a sealant for fuel cells, thus at best rendering use of the Kovar sealant in fuel cells “‘obvious to try’” (Brief, pages 10-11; Reply Brief, page 3). Appellants’ arguments are not persuasive. As admitted by appellants (specification, page 2; Brief, page 8; Reply Brief, page 2), the use of silicones in general as sealants for fuel cell components was well known in the art. Koschany teaches 2 that conventionally sealing rings or strips are used to provide reliable sealing of the gas spaces from each other in fuel cell components (col. 1, ll. 58-61; col. 2, ll. 25-27). Although Koschany discloses silicones as one of several possible sealant materials (col. 4, ll. 9-11 and 39; col. 8, ll. 7-10), with 2We note the presentation of claim 18 in Jepson-type format, thus impliedly admitting the preamble as prior art. See In re Aldrich, 398 F.2d 855, 857, 158 USPQ 311, 312 (CCPA 1968); In re Ehrreich, 590 F.2d 902, 909, 200 USPQ 504, 510 (CCPA 1979). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007