Appeal No. 2006-1772 Application No. 09/993,359 Invention The invention relates to a gaming machine, which allows a player to play a dice type game having the attributes of the game Bunco. See page 2 of appellants’ specification. Claim 109 is representative of the invention and reproduced below: 109. A gaming machine for playing a Bunco-type dice game comprising: a video display device; a cpu having a program operating a dice game; a wager input mechanism which registers a wager placed by a player; said program establishing a set of differing gameplay dice elements, including a subset of at least one match point at the start of the game, each said match point having a match indicium for potential matching with a subsequent toss of the dice elements; said program establishing and displaying a random toss of a plurality of dice elements at each stage of play, and determining for each die element tossed at a stage of play whether its randomly selected indicium matches said match indicium of said match point; and a payout mechanism providing an award according to a predetermined first paytable for each match on a toss. References The references relied upon by the examiner are: Edgeworth 2,125,236 Jul. 26, 1938 Matsumoto 5,263,715 Nov. 23, 1993 Falciglia 5,647,798 Jul. 15, 1997 Dice Gamers Resources –Bunco Rules (http://www.buncogame.com/brules.shtml, January 2000). Rejections at Issue Claims 109 through 115 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumoto in view of Edgeworth and Bunco Rules. The examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 3 through 5 of the answer. Claims 113 and 114 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumoto in view of 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007