Ex Parte Slomiany et al - Page 8



                   Appeal No. 2006-1772                                                                                           
                   Application No. 09/993,359                                                                                     

                          We consider the game of the game of “twenty six” and the game of Bunco to meet                          
                   the dice game as claimed in claim 109.  As stated supra, claim 109 does not recite how                         
                   the match point is determined, only that the match point is a subset of the value                              
                   represented on the dice.  In the game of “twenty six” as taught by Edgeworth, the player                       
                   selects a match point. See column 1, line 13 and 14. The player then makes successive                          
                   rolls and accumulates points based upon number of matches.  While the selection of the                         
                   match point is not based upon the initial roll of the dice as discussed in appellants’                         
                   specification, such a feature is not claimed.  Similarly, we consider the game of Bunco to                     
                   meet the disclosed dice game.  For the forgoing reasons appellants’ arguments have not                         
                   persuaded us that the claimed “Bunco-type” game differs from that taught by the prior                          
                   art.                                                                                                           
                          Appellants additionally argue, on pages 10 and 11 of the brief, there is no                             
                   motivation to combine the references as asserted by the examiner.  Appellants reason that                      
                   Matsumoto contains no reference to matching indicium on the dice element with                                  
                   indicium of a match point.  Further, appellants assert that Edgworth and Bunco rules fail                      
                   to make up for this deficiency, and in combination fail to teach or suggest the claimed                        
                   invention of a video display and program to match the randomly selected indicia of the                         
                   dice element with the selected dice element.                                                                   
                          The examiner, in response states, on page 12 of the answer;                                             
                                  Matsumoto is a modern slot machine that is used in playing a dice                               
                          game. It explicitly discloses craps, but it is clearly adapted to playing                               
                          virtually any dice game. As noted several times above, craps have many                                  
                          elements of Bunco. Furthermore, one of ordinary skill in the art would                                  
                          have known that Bunco could be implemented on a slot machine -                                          
                          Edgeworth teaches that. Once a decision is made to implement Bunco, it is                               
                          natural to look to the rules of the game for guidance.                                                  
                          We concur with the examiner.  As discussed supra we find that Matsumoto                                 
                   teaches a video gaming machine, a slot machine, where a user can play dice games.  The                         
                   gaming machine has a payout mechanism and paytables to determine payout for bets.                              
                   While we concur with appellants that craps is not a game of matching indicia on the dice                       



                                                                8                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007