Appeal No. 2006-1785 Page 28 Application No. 10/768,827 In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejections of claims 1- 34 in view of the prior art of record, but we have not sustained the examiner’s rejection of claims 15-25 under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-34 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED ) James D. Thomas ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Jerry Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Howard B. Blankenship ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/sjc/eldPage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007