Appeal No. 2006-1797 Application No. 09/866,319 B. Claims 2, 3, 14, 22, 26, 27 and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Marty. C. Claims 5 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Wen. D. Claims 7 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Ohmi. E. Claims 9, 10, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Rodgers. F. Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Akatsu. G. Claims 17 and 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Sato. H. Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty, Sato and Ju. I. Claims 20 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007