Ex Parte Johnson et al - Page 4




         Appeal No. 2006-1797                                                       
         Application No. 09/866,319                                                 



         B.  Claims 2, 3, 14, 22, 26, 27 and 33 stand rejected under 35             
         U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Marty.                             


         C.  Claims 5 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
         being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Wen.                  


         D.  Claims 7 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
         being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Ohmi.                 


         E.  Claims 9, 10, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
         as being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Rodgers.           


         F.  Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
         unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Akatsu.                     



         G.  Claims 17 and 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
         being unpatentable over the combination of Marty and Sato.                 


         H.  Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
         unpatentable over the combination of Marty, Sato and Ju.                   


         I.  Claims 20 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               

                                         4                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007