Appeal No. 2006-1816
Application No. 10/386,146
We observe that Appellants have not disputed any other
teachings of Graves and its combinability with Ko, nor have
provided any arguments with respect to any other claims.
Therefore, as the Examiner has established a prima facie case of
obviousness with respect to claim 1, we sustain the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of claim 1, as well as claims 2, 5-8, 10, 12-15, as falling
together (brief, page 5), over Ko and Graves.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007