Ex Parte Schena et al - Page 1




         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
         written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                                   
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     __________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     __________                                     
                  Ex parte BRUCE M. SCHENA and LOUIS B. ROSENBERG                   
                                     __________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2006-1831                                
                             Application No. 09/755,383                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                       
                                    ___________                                     

         Before KRASS, RUGGIERO and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.           
         HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the           
         final rejection of claims 47 through 68 and 71 through 80, all of          
         which are pending in this application. Claims 1-46, 69 and 70              
         have been cancelled by Appellants.                                         
         We affirm.                                                                 





                                     Invention                                      
         Appellants’ invention relates generally to a mouse (12),                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007