Ex Parte Krieger et al - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2006-1993                                                  Page 2                 
               Application No. 10/147,651                                                                   

                            determining the effect of the compound on cardiac fibrosis,                     
                      myocardial infarction, defects in electrical conductance,                             
                      atherosclerosis, unstable plaque, stroke, diseases associated with                    
                      abnormal cardiac structure or function or elevated cholesterol or                     
                      lipoprotein levels in the mouse relative to control mice not treated                  
                      with compound.                                                                        
                      13. A method for treating or preventing a disorder or disease                         
                      other than atherosclerosis characterized by abnormal lipoprotein                      
                      and cholesterol metabolism, wherein the disease is mediated by                        
                      SR-BI comprising administering to an individual in need thereof a                     
                      compound selected from the group consisting of 4,4’-                                  
                      (isopropylidenedithio) bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol), monoesters and                   
                      other derivatives thereof, 2,3-Dihydro-5-hydroxy-2,2-dipentyl-4,6-di-                 
                      tert-butyl-benzofuran or a derivative thereof, vitamin E and vitamin                  
                      C, wherein the compound is administered in an amount effective to                     
                      decrease lipoprotein levels or normalize lipoprotein structure or                     
                      reduce abnormal cholesterol metabolism.                                               
                      Claims 1-8 and 10-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                      
               paragraph, on the grounds that the specification fails to enable the full scope of           
               the claimed invention.  In addition, claims 13, 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35            
               U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Baldassarre,1 and claims 13-162 stand                
               rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Azen.3  Finally, claims            
               1-8 and 10-12 are subject to an obviousness-type double patenting rejection                  




                                                                                                           
               1 Baldassarre et al. (Baldassarre), “Clinical Evaluation of Probucol in Hypercholesterolemia:
               Individual Lipoprotein Responses and Inhibitory Effect on Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression,”
               Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Vol. 30, pp. 784-89 (1997).                          
               2 The statement of the rejection states that claims 14-16 stand rejected over Azen, see      
               Examiner’s Answer, page 6, but as all of those claims depend on claim 13, we assume that claim
               13 also stands rejected.  That also appears to be the understanding of appellants.  See Appeal
               Brief, page 15.                                                                              
               3 Azen et al. (Azen), “Effect of Supplementary Antioxidant Vitamin Intake on Carotid Arterial Wall
               Intima-Media Thickness in a Controlled Clinical Trial of Cholesterol Lowering,” Circulation, Vol.
               94, pp. 2369-72 (1996).                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007