Ex Parte Tsuchida et al - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2006-2070                                                       
         Application No. 09/986,586                                                 
              The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:           
         claims 1-3, 13-15 and 19-21 over Ohnuma in view of Final                   
         Fantasy VIII, and claims 4, 5, 16, 17, 22 and 23 over Ohnuma in            
         view of Final Fantasy VIII and Kondo.                                      
                                      OPINION                                       
              We reverse the aforementioned rejections.  We need to                 
         address only the independent claims, i.e., claims 1, 13 and 19.            
         Each of these claims requires 1) comparing an amount of damage             
         inflicted on an enemy character by a player character,                     
         immediately before the player character defeats the enemy                  
         character, with a threshold value previously set for the enemy             
         character, 2) changing a parameter stored in a storage device              
         according to a first condition when the enemy is defeated by an            
         amount of damage that is less than the threshold value, and                
         3) changing the parameter stored in the storage device according           
         to a second condition that is different from the first condition           
         when the enemy is defeated by an amount of damage that is at               
         least the threshold value.                                                 
              Ohnuma discloses an entertainment system that permits a user          
         “to input specific manipulation data via the manual controller             
         (for example, the user can input manipulation data by pressing             
                                                                                   
         therein by the appellant.  Since these two versions appear to describe the 
         same video game, we have considered both of them.                          
                                         3                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007