The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT KUHLMANN and KARL MEIER
____________
Appeal 2006-2186
Application 09/991,640
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 26, 2006
____________
Before KRATZ, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the rejection of claims 1-14 and 17. The only other
claims pending in this application, claims 15 and 16, have been indicated as
allowed by the Examiner (Answer § 3; see also Reply Br. ftnt. 1). We have
jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007