The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FRANCIS GABRIEL CELII, MAHESH THAKRE
and SCOTT R. SUMMERFELT
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-2209
Application No. 10/270,913
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the Examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 to 5, 7 to 14 and 16 to 25. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 134.1
1In rendering this decision we have considered the
Appellants’ position as set forth in the Briefs filed November
14, 2005 and March 30, 2006. We have also considered the
Examiner’s position presented in the Answer mailed January 27,
2006 and the Final Rejection mailed June 2, 2005.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007