Ex Parte Gabriel Celii et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-2209                                                        
          Application No. 10/270,913                                                  

          layer.  Representative claim 1, as presented in the Brief,                  
          appears below:                                                              
                    1.  A method of etching a bottom electrode layer in a             
               ferroelectric capacitor stack, comprising:                             
                    forming a hard mask over the ferroelectric capacitor              
               stack;                                                                 
                    etching the capacitor stack to expose the bottom                  
               electrode layer;                                                       
              plasma etching the bottom electrode layer at a low                     
               bias of less than 150 W with an atmosphere comprising a                
               halogen compound and an oxygen source containing carbon.               
               Upon careful consideration of Appellants’ position and the             
          position set forth by the Examiner, we are in complete                      
          agreement with the Examiner’s well supported position.                      
          Accordingly we affirm all of the Examiner’s rejections for the              
          reasons set forth in the Answer and add the following primarily             
          for emphasis.                                                               
               Appellants have not challenged the Examiner’s motivation               
          for combining Ko and Ying ‘494 together to reject the claimed               
          subject matter.  Rather, Appellants argue that the combination              
          would not produce the claimed invention (Brief, p. 4).  In                  
          further support of this argument, Appellants assert that Ying               
          ‘494 does not teach a plasma etch at a bias of less than 150 W              
          as claimed.  (Brief, p. 4).  Appellants further argue that Ying             
                                         3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007