Ex Parte Hopkins - Page 12



             Appeal No. 2006-2280                                                Page 12                    
             Application No. 10/244,011                                                                        
             We find that the common knowledge of one having ordinary skill in the art at the                  
             time the invention was made was that both crutches and canes suffer from the same                 
             problem of accidentally falling when leaned against the edge of a table or other                  
             surface.  See Dystar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG v. C.H. Patrick                       
             Co., 464 F.3d 1356, 1367, 80 USPQ2d 1641, 1650 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (“Our                             
             suggestion test is in actuality quite flexible and not only permits, but requires,                
             consideration of common knowledge and common sense.”)  Those persons having                       
             ordinary skill in the art recognized that a mechanism to maintain walking aid                     
             devices, such as crutches and canes, in a vertical position against the edge of a                 
             table or similar horizontal structure was needed.  See Hunn, col. 1, lines 22-26                  
             (directed to preventing a crutch from falling by using “an improved cane, crutch or               
             pole holder which is removably attached to the cane itself, and provides positive                 
             clamping means by which the cane is held in a vertical position against the edge of               
             a table or similar horizontal structure.”)  The common knowledge was that this                    
             need was the same for canes and for crutches, both of which are devices used to aid               
             a user in walking, and which are often rested against an edge of a table or other                 
             surface when not in use as a walking aid.  We find that one having ordinary skill in              
             the art, possessed with the teachings of Carpenter and with the common knowledge                  
             of one of ordinary skill that canes and crutches are both walking aid devices                     
             suffering from the same slippage problem, as noted in Hunn, would have been led                   
             to apply the guard device of Carpenter to a crutch to prevent a crutch from being                 
             dropped.                                                                                          
                   With regard to dependent claim 27, we find that Carpenter discloses that the                
             attachment (shaft strap 7) is a sleeve, which is wrapped around the shaft of the                  
             cane.  Carpenter, col. 1, lines 59-63.  With regard to dependent claim 28, we find                





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007