Ex Parte Kim et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                    
             publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                 __________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                 __________                                                    
                               Ex parte SARAH E. KIM and R. SCOTT LIST                                         
                                                 __________                                                    
                                           Appeal No. 2006-2317                                                
             Application No. 10/334,196                                                                        
                                                ___________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                      
                                                ___________                                                    
             Before THOMAS, KRASS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                                 DECISION                                                      
                   Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of                
             claims 1 through 22, 35, 37 and 38.  The examiner has indicated the allowability of               
             claim 36 and claims 23 through 34 have been withdrawn.                                            









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007