The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte EMILIO BARBERA-GUILLEM __________ Appeal No. 2006-2466 Application No. 09/835,759 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to compositions comprising a tumor-associated antigen and a component that depletes B cells. The examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We affirm the obviousness rejection and reverse the anticipation rejection. Background “Primarily, there are two subsets of [CD4+ lymphocytes], TH1 cells and TH2 cells.” Specification, page 1. TH1 cells “are generally accepted as being integral for cell mediated immunity” and TH2 cells “support a humoral immune response.” Id., pages 1-2.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007