Ex Parte Barbera-Guillem - Page 6


            Appeal No. 2006-2466                                                         Page 6              
            Application No. 09/835,759                                                                       

                   Appellant argues that Noguchi does not disclose all of the limitations of the             
            claims.  In particular, Appellant argues that IL-12 is not “an immunotherapeutic                 
            composition for effecting B cell depletion.”  Amended Appeal Brief, page 7.                      
                   We conclude that the examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that IL-12 is          
            “an immunotherapeutic composition for effecting B cell depletion.”  As defined in the            
            specification, an “immunotherapeutic composition” comprises an affinity ligand that              
            selectively binds to a determinant present on nonmalignant B cells and, upon binding,            
            directly or indirectly results in B cell depletion.  Specification, pages 8-9.  Regardless of    
            whether IL-12 results in B cell depletion, the examiner did not present a prima facie            
            case that IL-12 is an immunotherapeutic composition; i.e., that IL-12 comprises an               
            affinity ligand that selectively binds to a determinant present on nonmalignant B cells.         
            Therefore, the examiner has not presented a prima facie case that Noguchi anticipates            
            claim 1 or claims 2 and 7-10, which depend from claim 1.                                         
            3.  Obviousness                                                                                  
                   The examiner rejected claims 1-5, 7-12, 69-73, 77, 78, 80-86, 90, 92-96, 100,             
            102-108, 112, 114, and 115 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Apostolopoulos3 in              
            view of Tachibana,4 Trinchieri, Parkhouse,5 and Wang.6  The examiner argues that                 
            Apostolopoulos teaches that “‘mice immunized with either natural mucin (HMFG) or a               
            20mer synthetic peptide from the V[NT]R repeat or a MUC1 fusion protein (FP), and                
                                                                                                             
            3 Apostolopoulos et al., “Cell-mediated immune responses to MUC1 fusion protein coupled to mannan,”
            Vaccine, Vol. 14 No. 9, pp. 930-938 (1996).                                                      
            4 Tachibana et al., “Tumor Regression in Tumor-Bearing Mice by Inoculations of Immunogenic Somatic
            Hybrid Cells in Combination with Cyclophosphamide,” Tokai J. Exp. Clin. Med., Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 455-463
            (1983).                                                                                          
            5 Parkhouse et al., “Two Surface Antigen Targets for Immunotoxin-Mediated Elimination of Normal and
            Neoplastic Murine B Cells,” Current Topics in Microbiology & Immunology, Vol. 182, pp. 331-335 (1992).
            6 Wang, U.S. Patent No. 5,939,380, issued August 17, 1999.                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007