Appeal 2006-2632 Application 09/881,807 The examiner relies on the combined teachings of Narasimhan and Cotteret as discussed in connection with the rejection of independent claims 1, 57, 110, and 166, citing Casperson for a showing of features recited in dependent claims 32-39, 49-51, 87-94, 104-106, 142-149, and 159-161. Accordingly, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection for the same reasons stated above. REVERSED sld FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 1300 I STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Last modified: November 3, 2007