The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte CHI-WEN LIU and YING-LANG WANG ______________ Appeal 2006-2759 Application 10/043,860 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: September 28, 2006 _______________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 9 through 13, 15 through 19 and 21 and refusing to allow claim 5 as amended subsequent to the final rejection, which are all of the claims in the application. Claim 1 illustrates Appellants’ invention of a method for pre-etching a semiconductor wafer, and is representative of the claims on appeal: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007