Appeal No. 2006-2809 Page 10
Application No. 10/867,713
dependent claims are anticipated or would have been obvious over Bisperink, alone or
in view of any secondary references. If the examiner concludes that additional claims
are unpatentable, an appropriate rejection should be entered.
Summary
We reverse the examiner’s rejection and enter a new anticipation rejection of
independent claims 1 and 24.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007