The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SNORRI THORGEIR INGVARSSON, PHILIP LOUIS TROUILLOUD,
SHOUHENG SUN, ROGER HILSEN KOCH, and DAVID WILLIAM ABRAHAM
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2982
Application No. 10/458,112
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6, 8-20, 22-30 and 38. The examiner has
indicated that claim 21 contains allowable subject matter if rewritten in
independent form. Claim 7 was cancelled by amendment and claims 31-37
have been cancelled in response to a restriction requirement.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007