1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
2 was not written for publication
3 and is not binding precedent of the Board
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 ____________________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 ____________________
11
12 Ex parte MARTY SOLCZ and ANDREW NOESTHEDEN
13 ____________________
14
15 Appeal 2006-3026
16 Application 11/074,5491
17 Technology Center 1700
18 ____________________
19
20 Oral Argument: None
21 Decided: 29 September 2006
22 ____________________
23
24 Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LORIN and
25 TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
30
31 The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting
32 claims 1-12, all the claims in the application on appeal.
33 We affirm.
34
1 Application filed 8 March 2005. The real party in interest is Valiant International,
Inc., a Canadian corporation having offices in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Appeal Brief,
page 1 (filed 12 April 2006).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007