The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte GLENN F. SPAULDING
______________
Appeal 2006-3206
Application 09/550,276
Technology Center 1600
_______________
Decided: September 28, 2006
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the application to the examiner for consideration and
explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. §41.50(a)(1) (2006);
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed., Rev. 3,
August 2005).
We initially note that in spite of two Orders entered by this Board on
August 2, 2005 and March 7, 2006, the Examiner did not include the proper
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007