The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD A. HAIGHT, PETER P. LONGO
and ALFRED WAGNER
________________
Appeal 2007-0108
Application 10/698,884
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: December 1, 2006
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-14, and
20-25. Appellants submit that the “separate rejection of dependent claim 7,
which depends from claim 1, is not being presented for review in this
appeal” (Br. 5, paragraph four). Claims 1 and 23 are illustrative:
1. A method of depositing one or more elements on a substrate, the
method comprising the steps of:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007