Appeal 2004-1103
Application 09/733,387
misapprehended in arriving at our decision. Therefore, appellants’ request has
been granted to the extent that the decision has been reconsidered, but such
request is denied with respect to making any modifications to the decision
affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as lacking utility and § 112, first
paragraph, for lack of enablement based on the finding of lack of utility.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
REHEARING DENIED
)
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
Donald E. Adams ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge )
DEA/lbg
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013