The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALEXANDER FILATOV ____________ Appeal 2006-1160 Application 10/155,453 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: April 20, 2007 ____________ Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-14, 16-18, and 21-23. Under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a), the Appellant appeals only the rejection of claims 1-14 and 16-18. (Br. 5.) We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013