The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH K. MADATHIL,
PRANAB K. RAYCHAUDHURI
and CHING W. TANG
____________
Appeal 2006-1260
Application 09/956,411
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: January 11, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal which involves claims 2, 7, 8, 13, 15
and 17-22, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction
over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013