Ex Parte Madathil et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written       
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                         ____________                                           
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                    
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                           
                                         ____________                                           
                                Ex parte JOSEPH K. MADATHIL,                                    
                                 PRANAB K. RAYCHAUDHURI                                         
                                     and CHING W. TANG                                          
                                         ____________                                           
                                       Appeal 2006-1260                                         
                                     Application 09/956,411                                     
                                    Technology Center 1700                                      
                                         ____________                                           
                                    Decided: January 11, 2007                                   
                                         ____________                                           
              Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                       
              THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
              GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                              


                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                          
                   This is a decision on the appeal which involves claims 2, 7, 8, 13, 15       
              and 17-22, the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction     
              over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                      
                   We AFFIRM.                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013