The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM D. PRICE
____________
Appeal 2006-1290
Application 10/144,345
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: March 1, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
STUART S. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 11 to 30. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Appellant invented a recloseable bag which includes a pleat proximate
the closure member. A complete understanding of the subject matter on
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013